A Conundrum - Indiana Animals Rights

Wednesday, February 24, 2010 by Craig Curry
We find it quite interesting that WIBC is airing a commercial paid for by HSUS (Humane Society of the United States) this week about their version of the truth about Indiana Pet Stores. We wonder how an organization that has a 501c3 designation is able to justify paying for this type of lobbying media blitz with that 501c3 designation? It is our oppinion that most people in Indiana do not realize that HSUS has no direct links to any local Indiana Humane Society.

We believe if they truly wanted to Stop Cruelty to Animals in Indiana, HSUS would provide more direct funding to a local Indiana Humane Society or a local Indiana Dog Rescue. It is interesting that the Humane Society of Indianapolis has had a relationship with HSUS in the past. With the economy being the way that it is, we wonder if they would appreciate any of that money that HSUS collects to help their own animals? We ask you to click here and see for yourself what HSUS actually does with YOUR money. What does a national animals rights organization actually know about our small businesses here in Indiana?

We would like to provide you with a very useful resource to help you decide whether or not you want your money to go to this type of organization. We have been paying attention to the folks at Humane Watch for some time now. David Martosko is a very credible resource that HSUS truly does not like. There are so many watchdogs for so many non-profit organizations we believe that it is time HSUS got a watchdog and we think David Martosko is just the right man.

We are so glad that someone with the national following that David Martosko has, is now paying attention to all of the Animals Rights folks. So the next time you are wondering about Indiana Puppy Breeders or Indiana Pet Stores think about Humane Watch as well. We know that we will!!

Comments for A Conundrum - Indiana Animals Rights

Friday, February 26, 2010 by James Balfour:
If you really cared about animals, you wouldn't be directing people to a site run by a restaurant industry front group that is pro-veal, pro-animal testing (including live dogs and cats), pro-seal slaughter, pro-factory farming and pro-fur. How is Martosko a credible source? Despite not having a science degree, he claims it's safe to eat mercury-contaminated tuna. Visit http://www.BermanExposed.org
Monday, March 1, 2010 by Craig Curry:
Not many people have been able to get HSUS's attention at a national level. David Martosko has. I may not agree with everything that David believes but I do believe what he says about HSUS. When you mention pro-factory farming I wonder how YOU would feed seventy percent more people in the next 30 years? It is a shame when a real dialogue can not exist between disparate groups. I believe that HSUS really does not care about the animals that they say they do or they would spend more for the direct welfare of the animals that they collect the money for.

Leave a comment





Captcha